Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

In the Unit Review You Wrote a Statement in Which You Explain Whether You Considered Government

Affiliate 11. Developing a Disarming Argument

In this chapter, we will be applying the concepts presented to y'all in Chapter 10: Persuasion. Working through the self-practice exercise will assist y'all to develop a strong, disarming argument on a topic of your choice. At the end of Section 11.3: Organizing Your Ideas, yous volition demand to produce an outline to show to your instructor.

eleven.1 Coming Up With a Topic

Learning Objectives

  • Identify the requirements for your persuasive essay
  • Generate ideas on a topic for your persuasive essay
  • Formulate a enquiry question
  • Create a working thesis showing your topic and your controlling point of view
  • Carry preliminary research

The Requirements This cess is divided into three parts (the requirements of each are described below): A formal outline due week 11 A rough typhoon due week 12 A final draft due week 13. Y'all will receive 2.5% each for parts 1 and 2, and the final essay is worth 25%.

Essay 3: Persuasion (2.five % +two.5 % +25%)

Choose a controversial topic on which you can base a persuasive discussion of i,350 to 1,500 words.

You must:

  • Demonstrate the awarding of dialectics and consideration of altering points of view
  • Construct and follow a logical argument word
  • Provide supporting evidence from five to seven supplemental sources and include a reference page and citations.

Part A: Essay 3: Persuasive formal outline/v marks (2.5%) ** Due calendar week xi **

Create a formal, sentence outline for your instructor'south blessing. You must include:

  • A working thesis
  • A working outline
  • Topic sentences for each supporting paragraph
  • Notes of how you lot plan to develop your ideas
  • The sourcing data of where you will get bear witness to support your ideas.

You lot will exist marked on level of completion of the five components described above. Yous practice not take to stick to the outline exactly when yous starting time working on your draft, simply you will need to demonstrate yous have done some of the preliminary work.

Role B: Essay 3: Persuasive draft/10 marks (ii.5%) ** Due week 12 **

Create a offset draft of your persuasive essay. You must include:

  • A complete introduction
  • A complete conclusion
  • Paragraph development
  • A sit-in of idea development
  • A draft reference folio

Part C: Essay 3: Persuasive concluding submission/100 marks (25%) ** Due week 13 **

Write a 1,350 to 1,500 word persuasive essay on a controversial topic. Use the thesis, evidence, opposing statement, and concessionary argument equally the ground for writing a full persuasive essay. You must include:

An engaging introduction

Articulate explanations of all the testify y'all present

A strong conclusion.

The Controversy A controversial topic is one on which people accept stiff views. Imagine the type of discussion that can go really heated, commonly when the subject area is something people are passionate about. Merely a person who is passionate most a item outcome does not necessarily mean he or she recognizes the merits of the other view (although that often happens); it merely means that the person has collected bear witness (from a variety of sources) and synthesized those ideas to go far at a particular betoken of view. When you are trying to choose your topic for your persuasive newspaper, it is easier if you choose a topic about which you feel very strongly. You probably have realized past this point that when you are writing, it is a lot easier to write near a topic you already have some background knowledge on, and something you are extremely interested in. This helps to engage you and continue you interested in the writing process. No thing the topic you eventually decide to discuss, there are a few things you need to retrieve about before y'all begin the writing procedure. You volition need to make sure your field of study is: Pregnant . Is a word of this topic one that has the potential to contribute to a field of written report? Volition information technology make an touch? This does not mean every discussion has to alter lives, but it needs to be something relatively important. For case, a significant topic would be to convince your reader that eating at fast-food restaurants is detrimental to people'southward cardiovascular organization. A less significant discussion would exist if you were to try to convince your reader why one fast-food eatery is better than some other. Singular . This means you need to focus on i subject. Using the fast-food restaurant instance, if you were to focus on both the effects on the cardiovascular and endocrine organization, the discussion would lose that singular focus and there would be besides much for you to cover. Specific . Similar to the point above, your topic needs to be narrow enough to allow for you lot to really discuss the topic within the essay parameters (i.e., word count). Many writers are afraid of getting too specific considering they feel they will run out of things to say. If y'all develop the idea completely and give thorough explanations and plenty of examples, the specificity should non exist a problem. Supportable . Does evidence for what you want to discuss actually exist? There is probably some grade of evidence out in that location even for the near obscure topics or points of view. However, you demand to remember you should use credible sources. Someone'due south opinions posted on a weblog about why one fast-nutrient eating house is the best does non count as credible back up for your ideas.

Self Exercise Exercise eleven.i

In previous chapters, you learned strategies for generating and narrowing a topic for a research paper. Review the list of general topics below. Too, call up almost which topics you experience very strongly.

Freewrite for five minutes on ane of the topics beneath. Remember, yous volition demand to focus your ideas to a manageable size for a five to seven page research paper.

You are besides welcome to choose another topic; yous may want to double-check with your teacher if it is suitable. Information technology is important to call back that y'all want your paper to be unique and stand out from others'; writing on overly common topics may not help with this. Since nosotros accept already discussed the capital punishment as a form of punishment in the last chapter and already developed ideas, you should probably non choose this topic because your instructor wants you to demonstrate you have applied the procedure of disquisitional thinking on another topic.

Identify the fundamental words you will utilise in the next self practice do to preliminary enquiry to narrow down your topic.

Some appropriate controversial topics are:

  • Illegal immigration in Canada
  • Bias in the media
  • The role of faith in educational systems
  • The possibility of life in outer infinite
  • Modernistic day slavery around the world, ie. Man trafficking
  • Foreign policy
  • Television and advertising
  • Stereotypes and prejudice
  • Gender roles and the workplace
  • Driving and cell phones

Formulating a Inquiry Question

In forming a research question, you lot are setting a goal for your research. Your principal research question should exist substantial plenty to form the guiding principle of your paper, simply focused plenty to guide your research. A stiff enquiry question requires you lot non only to detect information simply as well to put together different pieces of data, interpret and analyze them, and effigy out what yous call back. Every bit you consider potential enquiry questions, ask yourself whether they would be too hard or besides easy to answer.

To determine your research question, review the freewriting you completed earlier. Skim through books, articles, and websites and listing the questions you lot have. (You may wish to use the 5WH strategy to help you formulate questions.) Include unproblematic, factual questions and more circuitous questions that require analysis and interpretation. Determine your main question—the primary focus of your paper—and several subquestions that you volition need to research to respond that master question.

Hither are the inquiry questions Jorge will utilize to focus his research. Notice that his main enquiry question has no obvious, straightforward reply. Jorge will need to inquiry his subquestions, which accost narrower topics, to answer his chief question.

Topic: Low-carbohydrate diets. Main question: Are low-carbohydrate diets as effective as they have been portrayed to be by media sources? Subquestions: Who can benefit from following a low-carboyhydrate diet? What are the supposed advantages to following a low-carbohydrate diet? When did low-carb diets a "hot" topic in the media? Where do average consumers get information about diet and nutrition? Why has the low-carb approach received so much media attention? How do low-car diets work?

Self Exercise EXERCISE 11.2

Using the ideas you came up with in Cocky Practice Do 11.1 , create a research question y'all would like to find the answer to through your inquiry and persuasive paper development. This is something you will use to help guide you in your writing and to check back with to make sure y'all are answering that question along the fashion.

_________________________________________________________________________

Collaborate with a partner and share your questions. Describe your topic and point of view and ask your partner if that question connects to that topic and point of view .

Self Practice EXERCISE xi.three

Working with the topic you take identified, use the enquiry skills you learned in previous capacity to locate approximately five potentially useful impress or electronic sources of information about the topic.

Create a listing that includes the post-obit:

One subject-specific periodicals database likely to include relevant articles on your topic

Ii manufactures about your topic written for an educated general audience

At least one article about your topic written for an audience with specialized knowledge

Organize your list of resources into principal and secondary sources. What makes them either principal or secondary? Pick one primary source and one secondary source and write a judgement or 2 summarizing the information that each provide due south .

Then respond these questions:

What blazon of principal source did y'all cull? Who wrote it, and why? Do you call up this source provides authentic data, or is it biased in some way?

Where did the information in the secondary source come up from? Was the author citing an initial study, piece of literature, or work of art? Where could yous find the principal source?

Self practice EXERCISE 11.4

With the topic from Self Practice Do 11.ane and the preliminary inquiry yous conducted in Cocky Practice eleven.3 and referring to Section x.two: The Structure of a Persuasive Essay , develop a working thesis and scratch outline.

Annotation that later reading Department 11.2: Dialectics, you will most likely revise your outline.

How to B e Really Convincing Sometimes it tin be very challenging to convince someone of your ideas and that your indicate of view is valid. If your reader has strong contrary views or has had emotional experiences in the past connected to that topic, your task in persuading will exist more challenging. However, if you consider your audience and tone (equally discussed in Section 10.3: Being Disquisitional) and think nearly the answers to the following questions in C hecklist 11.1, Who Is My Audience? , you volition exist better able to predict possible objections your reader may have to your argument and address those appropriately. It volition also help you lot make recognize how much and what kind of background information you need to provide your reader with context for your discussion.

Checklist 11.1 Who Is My Audience?

Who are my readers?

What exercise they already know on the subject?

What are they probable to be interested in?

How impartial or biased are they?

Is the subject area one that may claiming their upstanding or moral beliefs?

What values exercise we share?

What types of evidence will exist most constructive?

Cocky practice Exercise xi.5

Look dorsum at the two persuasive essay examples in Section ten.4: Examples: Persuasi ve Essays . With a partner, hash out the strengths and weaknesses of each example. Look at the credibility, tone, ceremoniousness to audience, and completeness of the ideas presented.

Case i
Strengths Weaknesses
Example 2
Strengths Weaknesses

Collaboration: W ith your partner, discuss how you could brand each of these arguments stronger.

xi.2 Dialectics

Learning Objectives

  • Explain the components, practice, and benefits of dialectical thinking
  • Conduct a dialect word to consider other points of view on your topic

As you read in Chapter 10, Department 10.3: Existence Critical, a stiff persuasive essay will respectfully identify and talk over perspectives of the same topic. When you do this, you are presenting a well-rounded and complete discussion to your reader that shows yous have critically thought about the topic and accept been selective in choosing your points. As a result, at that place is a higher probably that you lot volition convince your reader. The process of looking at multiple sides of a topic is called dialectics.

Dialectics is the act of using logical reasoning to combine, juxtapose, or synthesize opposing ideas to arrive at a potent conclusion.

The Components of Dialectics To begin the dialectic process, you beginning demand to come up with an idea of what topic volition be discussed; this is the thesis behind the discussion. Once you have determined your thesis, through various methods (the easiest beingness discussion with someone else), you will explore opposing sides to the topic, eventually discovering at least one antithesis. Combining those 2 perspectives, you tin then make your own conclusions. Possibly this procedure will result in you standing past the original thesis, or maybe the antithesis is incredibly convincing and y'all will switch sides of the argument, or maybe you lot still believe the original thesis but have at that place are other conditions that have brownie as well. This end result is chosen the synthesis: the blending of ideas. Essentially, the process would await like this:

Thesis plus Antithesis equals synthesis

Considering both your thesis and the discovered antithetical perspectives will help you to go far at a wider view of a topic: ane that has more than credibility. Looking dorsum to the persuasive essay samples y'all read in Section 10.four and discussed in Self Practice Practice eleven.5, consider to what degree the authors acknowledged opposing views. How did they justify their opinions? Consider how integrating dialectics into each of those arguments to a greater degree would have strengthened their points of view, ultimately making their arguments more convincing.

Self practice Do 11. vi

Based on the thesis " Governments employ capital punishment as an constructive tool for deterring trigger-happy criminal offense , " answer the post-obit questions and complete the table.

What is your opinion on this statement? To what extent do you agree/disagree?

_____________________________________________________________________

Complete the table because the thesis argument given above.

First complete the side of the table with ideas supporting the signal of view you lot described in question #one.

And so, challenge yourself to come upwards with ideas (you may need to do a little bit of research) that would support the other side of the discussion.

Supporting th due east statement Against thursday e statement

Collaboration: D iscuss your answers with a partner. Practise you both have the same ideas, or can you add to your list based on what your partner has come up with.

After coming upwardly with and considering the other perspective, has your point of view inverse at all?

Exercise yous still stick by your aforementioned point of view 100 percent? Or do y'all concede that at that place are valid points from the other perspective?

Self Practice Exercise xi. 7 /Discussion iii

Using both the scratch outline and the working thesis you created in Self Practice Do 11.4, create a table like the one y'all used in Self Practice Exercise 11.6 , only filling in the side with data that supports your thesis.

One time you have created that tabular array with your thesis given, share your table and thesis with a classmate.

Collaborate: Conduct a dialectic discussion on your topic and possible for and against the working thesis you presented. Add whatsoever points to your original table.

Call back to be aware of the procedure of synthesis you lot have gone through. Did your original point of view change at all? Is at that place anything you can make concessions on being valid? This may impact your thesis.

Using 1 or two of the opposing ideas your partner helped you lot come up up with, revise your scratch outline from Self Practice Practise 11.4.

11.three Organizing Your Ideas

Learning Objectives

  • Revise your working thesis
  • Create an outline including your thesis and primary and supporting points
  • Determine an appropriate organizational structure for a persuasive essay that uses critical analysis to connect your ideas and information taken from sources

For this department, you lot will need to refer back to Section x.ii: The Construction of a Persuasive Essay to assistance you piece your supporting and opposing ideas together.

Creating an Introduction and Thesis

The persuasive essay begins with an engaging introduction that presents the general topic. The thesis typically appears somewhere in the introduction and states the author'due south point of view.

Re evaluate Your Working Thesis

A careful analysis of your notes will assistance you re-evaluate your working thesis and make up one's mind whether you demand to revise information technology. Remember that your working thesis was the starting point—not necessarily the cease point—of your research. You lot should revise your working thesis if your ideas changed based on what you read. Fifty-fifty if your sources more often than not confirmed your preliminary thinking on the topic, it is still a good idea to tweak the diction of your thesis to incorporate the specific details you learned from enquiry.

Jorge realized that his working thesis oversimplified the issues. He still believed that the media was exaggerating the benefits of low-carb diets. However, his enquiry led him to conclude that these diets did have some advantages. Read Jorge's revised thesis.

Although following a low-carbohydrate diet can benefit some people, these diets are not necessarily the best option for everyone who wants to lose weight or improve their health.

Tip

Avoid forming a thesis based on a negative merits. For example, "The hourly minimum wage is non loftier plenty for the average worker to alive on." This is probably a true statement, just persuasive arguments should make a positive case. That is, the thesis statement should focus on how the hourly minimum wage is low or bereft.

Cocky practice Exercise eleven. eight

On a sheet of paper, utilise your working thesis and the revised outline from Self Practice Exercise 11.vii and list the types of show you might use in support of that thesis. Essentially, y'all are expanding your outline to include more than source data.

Synthesizing and Organizing Information

By now, your thinking on your topic is taking shape. You have a sense of what major ideas to accost in your newspaper, what points you can easily support, and what questions or subtopics might need a little more thought. In short, yous have begun the process of synthesizing data—that is, of putting the pieces together into a coherent whole.

It is normal to discover this role of the process a little difficult. Some questions or concepts may nonetheless exist unclear to you. You lot may not yet know how you lot will tie all of your research together. Synthesizing information is a circuitous, demanding mental chore, and even experienced researchers struggle with it at times. A little uncertainty is oft a good sign! Information technology means you are challenging yourself to work thoughtfully with your topic instead of simply restating the aforementioned data.

Synthesiz ing Information

You have already considered how your notes fit with your working thesis. Now, take your synthesis a step farther. Organize your notes with headings that stand for to points and subpoints you came up with through dialectics and compiled in your outline, which y'all presented to your instructor. As you proceed, y'all might identify some more of import subtopics that were not office of your original plan, or you might decide that some points are not relevant to your paper.

Categorize data carefully and continue to recollect critically about the textile. Ask yourself whether the sources are reliable and whether the connections between ideas are clear.

Recall, your ideas and conclusions will shape the paper. They are the glue that holds the residue of the content together. As you work, begin jotting down the big ideas you will use to connect the dots for your reader. (If you are non certain where to begin, try answering your major research question and subquestions. Add and answer new questions as appropriate.) You might record these big ideas on viscous notes or type and highlight them within an electronic document.

Jorge looked back on the list of research questions that he had written downward earlier. He changed a few to match his new thesis, and he began a crude outline for his paper.

chap11_3

You may be wondering how your ideas are supposed to shape the paper, especially since yous are writing a research paper based on your research. Integrating your ideas and your information from research is a circuitous procedure, and sometimes it can be difficult to separate the two.

Some paragraphs in your paper will consist generally of details from your research. That is fine, as long as you explicate what those details mean or how they are linked. You lot should too include sentences and transitions that show the relationship between different facts from your research by grouping related ideas or pointing out connections or contrasts. The outcome is that y'all are not simply presenting information; you are synthesizing, analyzing, and interpreting information technology.

Programme How to Organize Your Newspaper

The final step to complete before beginning your draft is to choose an organizational construction. For some assignments, this may be determined past the instructor's requirements. For instance, if y'all are asked to explore the impact of a new communications device, a cause-and-effect structure is evidently appropriate. In other cases, yous will need to determine the structure based on what suits your topic and purpose.

The purpose of Jorge's paper was primarily to persuade. With that in mind, he planned the post-obit outline.

outline

Essay 3: outline (2.5%)

Review the organizational construction discussed in Chapter ten: Persuasion. Working with the notes you organized before, follow these steps to begin planning how to organize your paper.

Create an outline that includes your working thesis, major subtopics, and supporting points.

The major headings in your outline will become sections or paragraphs in your paper. Remember that your ideas should form the courage of the paper. For each major section of your outline, write a topic sentence stating the primary signal you lot will make in that section.

As yous complete pace 2, you may find that some points are too complex to explain in a sentence. Consider whether whatsoever major sections of your outline need to be broken up and jot down boosted topic sentences every bit needed.

Review your notes and determine how the different pieces of data fit into your outline as supporting points.

Add any sources you have identified that yous programme on using to support your ideas.

Collaboration

  • Please share the outline you created with a classmate.
  • Examine your classmate's outline and run across if whatsoever questions come to mind or if you run into whatsoever expanse that would benefit from an additional indicate or clarification. Return the outlines to each other and compare observations.
  • After you have discussed your formal outline with a classmate, submit information technology to your instructor for approval.

You lot will receive upwardly to 2.5% toward your concluding grade depending on how thoroughly yous take conducted a dialectical discussion and developed your outline.

11.4 Critical Thinking and Research Applications

Learning Objectives

  • Analyze source materials to make up one's mind how they support or abnegate the thesis
  • Identify connections between source materials and eliminate redundant or irrelevant source materials

At this point in your project, you are preparing to motility from the inquiry stage to the writing phase. You have gathered much of the data you will utilize, and shortly yous will be fix to begin writing your typhoon. This section helps you transition smoothly from i phase to the next.

Beginning writers sometimes attempt to transform a pile of note cards into a formal research paper without any intermediary stride. This arroyo presents problems. The author's original question and thesis may be buried in a alluvion of disconnected details taken from enquiry sources. The commencement draft may present redundant or contradictory data. Worst of all, the writer'due south ideas and voice may exist lost.

An effective research paper focuses on the author'southward ideas—from the question that sparked the research procedure to how the writer answers that question based on the enquiry findings. Before starting time a typhoon, or even an outline, good writers intermission and reverberate. They ask themselves questions such as the following:

How has my thinking inverse based on my research? What have I learned?

Was my working thesis on target? Practise I need to rework my thesis based on what I have learned?

How does the information in my sources mesh with my research questions and assist me answer those questions? Accept any additional important questions or subtopics come upwardly that I volition need to address in my paper?

How do my sources complement each other? What ideas or facts recur in multiple sources?

Where practise my sources disagree with each other, and why?

In this department, you volition reflect on your enquiry and review the information you accept gathered. You lot will determine what yous now think about your topic. You volition synthesize, or put together, different pieces of information that help you answer your inquiry questions. Finally, y'all will determine the organizational structure that works best for your paper and revise the outline you have already fabricated and had approved to be a more formal sentence outline (an outline that contains more information like topic sentences, your supporting ideas organized more accordingly, and the sources you plan to use.

Selecting Useful Information

At this indicate in the inquiry process, y'all accept gathered information from a wide variety of sources. Now it is time to think about how you will employ this information as a writer.

When you comport research, y'all go along an open mind and seek out many promising sources. You take notes on any information that looks like it might assistance y'all reply your research questions. Often, new ideas and terms come up in your reading, and these, also, find their manner into your notes. Y'all may record facts or quotations that catch your attention even if they did non seem immediately relevant to your inquiry question. By now, you have probably amassed an impressively detailed collection of notes. You volition not utilise all of your notes in your newspaper.

Proficient researchers are thorough. They look at multiple perspectives, facts, and ideas related to their topic, and they assemble a smashing bargain of information. Constructive writers, however, are selective. They determine which data is most relevant and advisable for their purpose. They include details that develop or explain their ideas—and they leave out details that do not. The author, non the pile of notes, is the decision-making strength. The author shapes the content of the enquiry paper.

In Chapter vii: Sources: Choosing the Right Ones, you used strategies to filter out unreliable or irrelevant sources and details. At present you lot volition apply your disquisitional thinking skills to the data yous recorded—analyzing how it is relevant, determining how it meshes with your ideas, and finding how it forms connections and patterns.

Writing at Work

When you lot create workplace documents based on enquiry, selectivity remains important. A projection team may spend months conducting market surveys to prepare for rolling out a new product, but few managers accept time to read the inquiry in its entirety. Most employees want the research distilled into a few well-supported points. Focused, concise writing is highly valued in the workplace.

Identify Information That Supports Your Thesis

Begin by identifying the notes that clearly support your thesis. Mark or group these, either physically or using the cut-and-paste function in your discussion processing program. As you identify the crucial details that back up your thesis, make certain you clarify them critically. Ask the following questions to focus your thinking:

Is this detail from a reliable, loftier-quality source? Is it advisable for me to cite this source in an bookish paper? The majority of the back up for your thesis should come from reliable, reputable sources. If well-nigh of the details that back up your thesis are from less-reliable sources, you may need to do additional inquiry or modify your thesis.

Is the link betwixt this information and my thesis obvious , or will I need to explain it to my readers? Recall, you accept spent more time thinking and reading near this topic than your audience. Some connections might be obvious to both you and your readers. More often, even so, you lot will need to provide the assay or explanation that shows how the information supports your thesis. As you lot read through your notes, jot downwardly ideas you lot have for making those connections articulate.

What personal biases or experiences might bear on the way I interpret this information? No researcher is 100 percent objective. We all have personal opinions and experiences that influence our reactions to what nosotros read and learn. Good researchers are aware of this human tendency. They go on an open up listen when they read opinions or facts that contradict their beliefs.

Tip

It can exist tempting to ignore data that does not support your thesis or that contradicts it outright. However, such information is of import. At the very to the lowest degree, it gives you a sense of what has been written nigh the issue. More importantly, it can help you question and refine your own thinking so that writing your research paper is a true learning process.

Find Connections between Your Sources

Equally you find connections between your ideas and information in your sources, also look for information that connects your sources. Do most sources seem to hold on a particular thought? Are some facts mentioned repeatedly in many different sources? What cardinal terms or major concepts come up upward in most of your sources regardless of whether the sources hold on the finer points? Identifying these connections will help you lot identify important ideas to discuss in your newspaper.

Look for subtler ways your sources complement one another, too. Does ane author refer to some other's book or article? How exercise sources that are more than contempo build upon the ideas developed in before sources?

Be enlightened of any redundancies in your sources. If you lot have amassed solid support from a reputable source, such as a scholarly journal, there is no need to cite the same facts from an online encyclopedia article that is many steps removed from any primary research. If a given source adds nothing new to your discussion and you can cite a stronger source for the same information, utilize the stronger source.

Determine how you will address any contradictions found among unlike sources. For instance, if one source cites a startling fact that you cannot confirm anywhere else, it is safe to dismiss the information equally unreliable. However, if y'all notice significant disagreements amongst reliable sources, y'all will need to review them and evaluate each source. Which source presents a more sound argument or more solid evidence? It is upward to you to determine which source is the most credible and why.

Finally, do not ignore any information but considering it does not support your thesis. Carefully consider how that information fits into the large picture of your research. You may determine that the source is unreliable or the information is not relevant, or y'all may decide that it is an important point you demand to bring up. What matters is that you give it careful consideration.

Self practice EXERCISE eleven. 9

Consider the information you have included in the outline that was approved by your instructor and the source data you compiled in Self Practice Exercise 11.8 . Utilise the information in this department to critically evaluate the usefulness, relevance, and appropriateness of the sources you lot have selected to support your ideas. Eliminate any that you experience take you off topic or are non credible sources.

Key Takeaways

  • An effective research paper focuses on presenting the writer's ideas using information from inquiry as support.
  • Effective writers spend time reviewing, synthesizing, and organizing their research notes before they begin drafting a research paper.
  • Information technology is important for writers to revisit their inquiry questions and working thesis as they transition from the research phase to the writing phrase of a project. Commonly, the working thesis volition need at least pocket-sized adjustments.
  • To organize a enquiry paper, writers cull a structure that is appropriate for the topic and purpose. Longer papers may make utilise of more than one structure.

Journal entry #11

Write multiple paragraphs responding to the following. This is your final periodical entry, and then y'all want to make sure you reverberate on what you have learned throughout the semester and your general writing skills.

What is the topic around which you would like to base of operations your persuasive essay discussion?

Why did you choose this topic?

What challenges do you think you lot may face when writing about this topic?

Reflect on your writing skill development over the semester. Be as specific as possible.

What are you most confident doing? W lid do you all the same need to practis e?

What practise you call back is your biggest accomplishment this semester?

Remember equally mentioned in the Assessment Descriptions in your syllabus:

You will be expected to respond to the questions by reflecting on and discussing your experiences with the semester's material.

When writing your journals, yous should focus on freewriting—writing without (overly) because formal writing structures – just remember that information technology will exist read by the instructor, who needs to be able to understand your ideas.

Your instructor will begin reading your Journal Package 2 this week. (two.5%)

robinsontwereen.blogspot.com

Source: https://opentextbc.ca/writingforsuccess/chapter/chapter-11-developing-a-convincing-argument/

Post a Comment for "In the Unit Review You Wrote a Statement in Which You Explain Whether You Considered Government"